Coda vs Google Sites

Imagine, if you will, a vast and sprawling universe of digital tools, each one orbiting its own peculiar star, spinning out strange and wondrous possibilities for the unwary space traveler. In one distant corner of this vast expanse sits Coda, a marvelously versatile contraption that seems to be part document, part spreadsheet, part database and possibly part sentient, though it hasn’t made up its mind yet. It offers the kind of flexibility usually reserved for Swiss Army knives and improbable space fleets. Here, teams can create elaborate workflows that would make even a Vogon administrator weep with envy. Want to manage structured data while simultaneously building interactive documents and secretly believing you’ve become the master of your own digital universe? Well, Coda is your hyperspace ticket.

On the other side of the galaxy, glowing serenely and humming a reassuring tune, is Google Sites, the reliable cousin that doesn’t try to be everything at once, nor does it come with a manual longer than the Encyclopedia Galactica. It’s designed for people who need a website but would rather not have to fiddle about with anything too technical—possibly because they still have nightmares about the time their toaster gained sentience. Instead, Google Sites promises simplicity: drag, drop, collaborate, share—and before you know it, you’ve created something vaguely useful, like a team wiki, a project portal, or an intranet site that doesn’t feel like it was designed by a committee of overly enthusiastic bureaucrats.

See also: Top 10 Wiki software